5 Comments
User's avatar
Karina K.'s avatar

Fantastic piece. Viewing this through the lens of a fixed-income trade rather than a deep-value equity cyclical makes total sense of the current yield environment. That RMB 75 trillion maturity wall is a massive structural catalyst on the liability side that almost nobody else is talking about. Thanks for the disciplined framework and the clear falsifiability lines on the payout ratio—clipping a 7% coupon while waiting on the structural RMB thesis is a compelling place to sit.

The Madam Finance's avatar

That makes sense. Anchoring the thesis to a visible payout floor rather than trying to forecast geopolitics keeps it grounded in something measurable. Watching the number, not the headlines, is a disciplined way to run it.

The Madam Finance's avatar

This is a sharp reframing. Viewing state banks as long-duration synthetic bonds rather than growth equities makes the yield logic much clearer.

The payout ratio as the primary sell signal is disciplined.

How do you think about geopolitical tail risk in this structure, especially around sanctions or capital controls impacting HK‑listed shares?

Philip Reschke's avatar

Thanks. Fair question, and I'll answer it the way I actually run the position, because I can't forecast geopolitics and don't try to.

Buying these as bonds is the whole point: the thesis doesn't lean on a political call. The coupon is a dividend paid out of profit, the listing is in Hong Kong, and the thing that takes me out is the payout floor giving way. CMB's floor is written into its articles of association; the three state banks sit on the SASAC 30 per cent framework. Either way it's a number I can watch every interim, not a headline I have to predict.